EN BG

The Semmelweis Reflex

The doctor who proved hand-washing saves lives was committed to an asylum. The medical establishment wasn't ready to hear it.

In the 1840s, Ignaz Semmelweis noticed that women in maternity wards staffed by doctors died at five times the rate of those attended by midwives. The difference? Doctors came straight from autopsies without washing their hands. When he introduced hand-washing, death rates plummeted. The medical community responded not with gratitude but with hostility. His colleagues rejected the evidence, attacked his character, and eventually had him institutionalised. He died in the asylum. Decades later, germ theory proved him right.

The Semmelweis Reflex is the automatic rejection of new evidence because it contradicts established beliefs. It's not about stupidity. The doctors who rejected Semmelweis were educated, experienced, and operating within the best framework they had. That's exactly the problem. When your identity and career are built on a paradigm, evidence that threatens it doesn't feel like information — it feels like an attack.

This reflex is still operating. In every field, findings that challenge dominant theories face disproportionate resistance — not because the evidence is weak, but because the implications are uncomfortable. The test of intellectual honesty isn't whether you accept evidence that confirms what you already believe. It's whether you can sit with evidence that doesn't.

References