EN BG

Identity-Protective Cognition

You're not evaluating the evidence. You're protecting your membership card.

Identity-protective cognition is what happens when your brain processes facts not to find the truth, but to maintain your standing in your group. If your political tribe says climate change is a hoax, your brain will find reasons to dismiss the science — not because the science is weak, but because accepting it would put you at odds with your people. The social cost of being right is higher than the social cost of being wrong.

This isn't about intelligence. Research shows that more scientifically literate people are actually more polarised on politically charged topics, not less. They don't use their knowledge to get closer to the truth — they use it to build more sophisticated defences for their group's position. Better education doesn't solve this. It just gives the defence lawyer better tools.

The effect is invisible from the inside. You genuinely feel like you're thinking independently. You can point to evidence, cite sources, build arguments. But if you trace those arguments back far enough, they almost always lead to a group identity, not an independent analysis.

The test is simple: have you ever held a position that put you at odds with your own side? If the answer is never, that's not agreement — that's obedience.

References